Home
Bishop
Sermons
Perth Diocese
|
Bishop Farran's Sermons 2004
A sermon
preached by Bishop Brian Farran at All Saints Dianella for the Feast of
Title 2004.
(Based on: 'just as you want people to act toward you, act in the same
way toward them' Luke 6:31)
As a young boy I was entranced by the
stories my grandmother told me about ration books used during the second
World War and its aftermath and about meals of bread and dripping. In
the late 1950s Australia was a prosperous nation, at least for a primary
school boy who could attend the Saturday afternoon matinee each
Saturday, have four shillings pocket-money, and even save in his
Commonwealth Bank tin money box and school account. Life was sweet then,
and my Nanna's stories of rationing seemed like ancient history.
I think I might have tried bread and dripping as an experiment; it was
not a regular meal, as it had been for my grandmother and her family. My
grandmother -her generation and indeed my parents too- knew scarcity as
a normal part of their life-style. I remember visiting a friend's house
in Brisbane that was built just after the Second World War and the
structure seemed like a very resilient version of cardboard. The
building materials were manufactured during a time of resource scarcity
and were unlike anything else I had previously seen.
The Australian commentator and social researcher Hugh Mackay has often
indicated that Australia is now made up of several generations who
relate to each other as complete foreigners. For instance, last Friday
night I was at a Valedictory service for the first Year 12 graduates
from Peter Moyes Anglican Community School at Mindarie. I noted that as
soon as the graduating students had filed out of the assembly area at
the conclusion of the service, several of them were on their mobile
phones, arranging the rest of their evening!
Those contemporary students are light years away from my Nanna and her
diet of bread and dripping. Indeed, it is as if they live in parallel
universes, without making too many connections of common experience.
Hugh Mackay indicates that it is difficult for the diverse generations
who make up Australia, who live together within extended families, to
understand each other well. The primary and major difference is their
outlook on life. The different outlooks on life are direct consequences
of the social and economic environments by which the generations have
been shaped.
One difficulty for those in any leadership position in any organization
that embraces several generations is that just when you think you have
understood each generation, another pops up requiring understanding. So
we have the sacrificial generation, the baby-boomers, the baby-busters,
generation X, generation Y, and whatever tag is being given to young
primary schoolies.
Hugh Mackay's warning is that as a member of a particular generation
each of us tends to reflect the stance or values of our generation of
origin. Thus each of us has difficulty in getting inside the minds of
others from other generations. If we eavesdrop on one another, we will
hear much tut-tutting about the behaviour of other generations, or their
values, or their priorities. "In my day, we wouldn't..." is standard
conversational fare!
My archdeacon recently conducted a ministry consultation in a parish
that was preparing itself to invite a new priest to become its missional
leader. The consultation was well attended, clearly representative of
the parish, and very honest. As Michael Wood wrote up the detail of the
consultation and summarised it for the meeting, it became obvious to all
that were intending to live with a major contradiction.
The meeting said that as a church they wanted to develop ministry to
attract the very many teenagers that lived within the parish and
attended the local high school. The meeting also said that they did not
want to change, that they were not good at change, that they feared
change.
The majority at that parish consultation were aged much as is this
congregation - fairly typical of the present constituency of the
Anglican Church in Perth. The contradiction emerged from the natural
attitudes operant for particular generations. Although it is strange
that people who say they do not want change or do not know how to change
nightly sit in front of colour television sets rather than sit in a
lounge room gathered around a radio console, use microwave ovens rather
than daily chop wood for a slow-combustion stove, programme washing
machines rather than boil the copper, shop in supermarkets rather than
wait at home for the greengrocer, then the baker, then the milkman and
the iceman to make their deliveries!
I am laying it on. We all have accommodated ourselves to great changes,
changes that have freed up our time, changes that have given us greater
entertainment, changes that have made it possible to travel almost
effortlessly, changes that have secured our health and well-being. Now,
for instance, if you go shopping at the hardware store, you can have
coffee there too. What once were discrete, separated enterprises we now
find amalgamated in surprising and serviceable conglomerates.
However, change is still a delicate matter within the church. Obviously,
we find it difficult not only to attract young adults, teenagers and
even children but also to hold them within our parish communities. There
are a few parish Sunday services that are noisy with young children,
with mothers and babies, but generally worship is quiet, refined, and
very acceptable to two particular generations of Australians - the baby
boomers and the sacrificial generation.
The issue of inclusion that I am raising is the more acute for us now as
a church because in this day we really believe that we should value
everyone. One of the greatest changes that has taken place in our
life-time is the value that we now give to children, the respect we give
children, the attention to their needs that is accorded them. I notice
this each time I visit a school, especially our Anglican Schools.
For instance, last Tuesday I spent the entire day with the chaplains at
John Septimus Roe Anglican Community School at Mirrabooka as they
undertook their usual routines of chaplaincy. I was delighted by the
Year 10 chapel service that featured a young female student singing a
most moving religious ballad, a collage of projected images that formed
the intercessions with the refrain help us God superimposed upon a
picture of the Beatles' Album HELP. It was in the idiom, the culture of
the Year 10s, as was the chaplain's address.
Now, when I was in Year 10, we sat rigid, scared of misbehaving because
we would be canned. The atmosphere is so different. The students are
valued, delighted in, respected and affirmed. As one parent remarked to
me at last Friday's Valedictory Dinner, "who would want to leave school
nowadays?"
This valuing that has changed society so richly is explicit in the
teaching of Jesus. Jesus' affirmations of children were not about their
cuteness, but about their vulnerability, their lack of status, their
powerlessness. As Jesus signalled out children as models of receiving
the Kingdom of God, he was requiring all disciples to become as those
children were then - dependent entirely upon the embracing of the
Kingdom of God to ensure them the value implicit in their relationship
with God.
We have much catching up to do in the present-day church in our ministry
with children. For we are failing in practising a core piece of the
teaching of Jesus that is set in the lections for the observance of this
wonderful feast of All Saints - 'just as you want people to act toward
you, act in the same way toward them'.
If our way of being the church were informed by this gospel principle,
how might congregations look on Sunday mornings? Might our Sunday
mornings represent the value we accord to the various generations that
now make up our local Australian community?
We must struggle with this ethical and missional dilemma, just as the
first Christians struggled with it. It is obvious from the letters of
Saint Paul that inclusion in worship, as much as in the churches
themselves, was a tension. The shift that Jesus requires from
utilitarian ethics where we look after the like-minded expecting them to
look after us, to the ethic of self-giving love towards all that
reflects the self-expending of God, is a huge shift in thinking and in
behaving.
Yet our integrity as a church requires that we at the least attempt such
a shift. This means that like the first Christians - those whom Paul
names as 'saints', holy ones - we will stay with the tensions of being
inclusive and not subside into the past familiarities of easy exclusion.
What might sustain us as we seek to be obedient to the teaching and
example of the Lord Jesus, as we live up to our name as 'saints' or
'holy ones'? What might empower us so that as a church we do not lapse
into nor luxuriate in our natural comfort zone and so be a church for
some generations and not for all?
To suggest an answer to these vital questions, I want to extract a
metaphor from my grandmother's rationing experiences. It just might be
that many Anglicans, especially those who have lived with the Anglican
Church for a long time, have a 'bread and dripping' view of themselves
as Christians, and have a 'bread and dripping' spirituality. Let me try
to tease out this observation.
Bread and dripping belong to the realm of scarcity. My impression is
that each of us can think of ourselves as Christians in terms of
scarcity -what gifts we do not have- rather than in terms of abundance
-what gifts we do have and the natural extravagance of God. Jesus tried
hard to get the people of his own day to make the imaginative leap of
awareness that if wildflowers are beautiful, enchanting, glorious, then
they as children of God are much more beautiful, enchanting and glorious
to God. It is when we make that leap of understanding, that scarcity
shrinks, and abundance flows in, almost like a rushing, returning
coastal tide.
Not only do individual Christians need to make this cognitive switch
from scarcity to abundance (a natural consequence of simply taking God
at Jesus' word), so also do churches who often set their budgets from an
expectation of scarcity rather than from an expectation of generosity.
The miracle of the wine at the wedding at Canna of Galilee is about what
we can expect from the ministry of the Raised Christ - that abundance is
his preferred way of doing things, not meagreness and certainly, not
scarcity!
Some years ago I saw this principle of abundance thinking at work in a
group of elderly women. These elderly women had come to mid-week worship
for years, stayed for a cuppa, and then dispersed into their several
lonelinesses until the next Wednesday. I inherited this practice in one
church. As I got to know these women, I assessed that they were rich in
wisdom, even if they denied it. I invited them to form a bible study
together.
They must have been daring, for they did undertake group bible study.
Now these were women who had never done bible study before, at least not
in public. We adopted a simple African Bible study method that
concentrated on the power of the text being able to speak directly into
our lives. Soon these women who would have assumed a 'bread and
dripping' demeanour about their faith were sharing profound life
experiences, rich insights, and were including each other in
understanding, support and love. They became a community that took Jesus
at his word - 'just as you want people to act toward you, act in the
same way toward them'.
On this day of your feast of title, let me ask you as God's 'holy ones',
the saints in Dianella, to move from a 'bread and dripping' scarcity
spirituality to a 'bread and wine' abundance spirituality both in how
you think of yourself as a child of God and in how you exercise your
gifts for ministry.
A 'bread and wine' abundance spirituality daily remembers the words from
the Great Thanksgiving Prayer used at Baptism,
You pour your Spirit upon us, filling
us with your gifts,
and calling us to serve you as a royal priesthood.
To live in daily remembrance of this is
to live out of abundance, not scarcity. It is when God's lavish presence
is intimately known that the church can be an inclusive church that
values the various generations that make up our Australian community.
This morning I am inviting you not to 'bread and dripping' but to 'bread
and wine'!
Revised webmaster
Tuesday, 02 November 2004 |
Read about...
Regional Assembly 2004 - 22
May 2004, with Bishops Katharine Jefforts-Schori (Nevada) & John Harrower
(Tasmania) and pictures
|